THE WORKS OF SANKARA

VIVEKA CHUDAMANI

SLOKAS 451 TO 460

¢SÝy    uvac
åOanaEdyaÏp¤rarÖD|    kmI    åOana°    nÜy¢t    ,
AdÏva    ÞvPl|    lßym¤¢êÜyaEÏs¦¾baNvt¯    .451.  
åOanaEdyaÏp¤rarÖD|   which has fashioned this body prior to the dawning of knowledge
kmI   the work
åOana°   nÜy¢t   is not destroyed by that knowledge
AdÏva   without yielding
ÞvPl|   its fruits
lßym¤¢êÜyaEÏs¦¾baNvt¯    like the arrow shot at an object

451. The disciple said: Yes, all actions vanish after knowledge; but what of prior actions? Knowledge cannot destroy their effects, like an arrow that has been shot.
 
ÛyaG#b¤Ñ¯DYa    ¢v¢nm¤I³aE    baN:    pàaäO¤    gaEmtaW    ,
n    ¢t¿¢t    ¢CnäyEv    lßy|    vEgEn    ¢nBIrm¯    .452.  
ÛyaG#b¤Ñ¯DYa   with the idea that it is a tiger
¢v¢nm¤I³aE   which is shot
baN:   the arrow
pàaäO¤   then
gaEmtaW   when the object is perceived to be a cow
n   ¢t¿¢t   does not
¢CnäyEv   but pierces the object
lßy|   check itself
vEgEn   force
¢nBIrm¯   with full
 
452. You shot a cow thinking it was a tiger and now you find your mistake; but the arrow completes its work.
½£g¤ââvac
p#arÖD|    blväOr|    Kl¤    ¢vda|    BaEgEn    tÞy    Xy:
sØyg¯    åOanh^taSnEn    ¢vly:    p#aÀs|¢ctaga¢mnam¯    ,
b#'aÏmWÀymvEßy    tÓmytya    yE    svIda    s|¢ÞTta    -
ÞtExa|    t¢ÏæOty|    n¢h    Àv¢cd¢p    b#'Wv    tE    ¢ng¤INm¯    .453.
 
½£g¤ââvac   The Guru said
p#arÖD|   Prarabdha work
blväOr|   Kl¤   is certainly very strong
¢vda|   for the man
BaEgEn   of realization
tÞy   Xy:   and is spent only
sØyg¯   by the actual
åOanh^taSnEn   by the fire of perfect knowledge
¢vly:   are destroyed
p#aÀs|¢ctaga¢mnam¯   previously accumulated
b#'aÏmWÀymvEßy   realizing their identity with Brahman
tÓmytya   that alone
yE   svIda   are always
s|¢ÞTta   living
ÞtExa|   to those
t¢ÏæOty|   none of the three
n¢h   are not there
Àv¢cd¢p   always
b#'Wv   the transcendent Brahman
tE   they
¢ng¤INm¯   are verily
 
453. The teacher says: Yes,  you  are  right. Prarabdha  is very  powerful and  will  bring  effects. knowledge  destroys what has  been  accumulated and actions   in the future, but not what  is  done. But he who is in Brahman  is unaffected  by all   the  three cases.
upa¢DtadaÏØy¢vh£nkEvl    -
b#'aÏmnWvaÏm¢n    ¢t¿taE    m¤nE:    ,
p#arÖDsëavkTa    n    y¤³a
Þvp"aTIs|bÓDkTEv    jag#t:    .454.  
upa¢DtadaÏØy¢vh£nkEvl    devoid of identification with limiting adjuncts
b#'aÏmnWvaÏm¢n   in his own Self as Brahman, the one without a second
¢t¿taE   who lives
m¤nE:   for the sage
p#arÖDsëavkTa   the existence of Prarabdha work is
n   y¤³a   meaningless
Þvp"aTIs|bÓDkTEv   having any connection with the objects seen in the dreamstate
jag#t:   of a man who has awakened from sleep

454. Prarabdha pertains  to  the  upadhis, which do not affect one  in  Brahman.  It  is  not  correct  to attribute  things in  a  dream to one who  is  awake.   
n    ¢h    p#b¤Ñ¯D:    p#¢tBasdEhE
dEhaEpyaE¢gÓy¢p    c    p#p·E    ,
kraEÏyhÓta|    mmta¢mdÓta|
¢kÓt¤    Þvy|    ¢t¿¢t    jagrEN    .455.  
n   ¢h   not there
p#b¤Ñ¯D:   who has awakened
p#¢tBasdEhE   with regard to his dreambody
dEhaEpyaE¢gÓy¢p  c   and the dreamobjects that ministered to that body
p#p·E   in that world
kraEÏyhÓta|   any idea of "I"
mmta¢mdÓta|   or "Mine" and this is the object
¢kÓt¤   but
Þvy|   ¢t¿¢t   lives, as his own Self
jagrEN   quite awake
 
455. One who  is  awake does  not  identify  himself  with  the  body  or the   actions  of  the dream state. So too  one  awake  in  Brahman does not identify  himself  with the body  of the dream state.
 
n    tÞy    ¢mÐyaTIsmTInEÅCa
n    s|g#hÞtÇjgtaE{¢p    è¾:    ,
tæOan¤v¦¢äOyI¢d    cEÓm¦xaT©I
n    ¢nd#ya    m¤³    it£ÝytE    D#¤vm¯    .456.  
n   tÞy   not, to him
¢mÐyaTIsmTInEÅCa   nor is he seen to maintain that dreamworld
n   s|g#hÞtÇjgtaE{¢p   he has no desire to substantiate the unreal objects
è¾:   not to be seen
tæOan¤v¦¢äOyI¢d    if he still clings to those
cEÓm¦xaT©I   unreal objects
n   ¢nd#ya   not yet, from sleep
m¤³   it£ÝytE   declared to be free
D#¤vm¯   emphatically
 
456. Therefore  he  does  not  subscribe to  acquire what  is  unreal. If he does so, he is still in the dream state.  
t¹ÏprE    b#'¢N    vtIman:
sdaÏmna    ¢t¿¢t    naÓyd£XtE    ,
Þm¦¢tyITa    Þvp"¢vlaE¢ktaT©I
tTa    ¢vd:    p#aSnmaEcnadaW    .457.  
t¹ÏprE   similarly
b#'¢N   in Brahman
vtIman:   he who is absorbed
sdaÏmna   with that eternal Reality
¢t¿¢t   lives
naÓyd£XtE   and beholds nothing else
Þm¦¢tyITa   as one has a memory of the objects
Þvp"¢vlaE¢ktaT©I   seen in a dream
tTa   ¢vd:   so the man of realization
p#aSnmaEcnadaW   of the everyday actions such as eating
 
457. So one in the  Supreme state, sees  nothing  else.He lives in  the  world, but his actions in the world are like memories of the dream  state.
kmINa    ¢n¢mItaE    dEh    p#arÖD|    tÞy    kÚÔytam¯    ,
nanadEraÏmnaE    y¤³|    nWvaÏma    kmI¢n¢mIt:    .458.  
kmINa   by Karma
¢n¢mItaE   has been fashined
dEh   the body
p#arÖD|   Prarabdha work
tÞy   with reference to it
kÚÔytam¯   one may imagine
nanadEraÏmnaE   to attribute the same to the Atman
y¤³|   not reasonable
nWvaÏma   for the Atman is never
kmI¢n¢mIt:   the outcome of work
 
458. This  body  is the result of actions and prarabdha pertains to the  body.But   the Atman  is beyond the body and its prarabdha.

AjaE    ¢nÏy    Saát    i¢t    b#¥tE    ½¤¢trmaEGvakq    ,
tdaÏmna    ¢t¿taE{Þy    k[t:    p#arÖDkÚpna    .459.  
AjaE   "birthless
¢nÏy   eternal
Saát   i¢t   and undecaying"
b#¥tE   declare
½¤¢trmaEGvakq   the Srutis,whose words are infallible
tdaÏmna   identified with That (Atman)
¢t¿taE{Þy   to the man who lives
k[t:   how can
p#arÖDkÚpna   Prarabdha work be attributed?
 
459. The scriptures affirm that the Atman is  unborn,  eternal, and universal and     that can never be false.  
p#arÖD|    ¢sÒy¢t    tda    yda    dEhaÏmna    ¢ÞT¢t:    ,
dEhaÏmBavaE    nWvE¾:    p#arÖD|    ÏyÇytamt:    .460.  
p#arÖD|   Prarabdha work
¢sÒy¢t   can be maintained
tda   only so long
yda   as
dEhaÏmna   identified with the body
¢ÞT¢t:   one lives
dEhaÏmBavaE   ever identifies with the body
nWvE¾:   no one admits
p#arÖD|   Prarabdha work
ÏyÇytamt:   hence, should be rejected in his case

460. One sees prarabdha while  in  the  body, but giving up the  body  is giving    up the other.      


PROCEED TO SLOKAS 461 TO 470
RETURN TO INDEX OF VIVEKA CHUDAMANI